Pinus cembra
Swiss stone pine

Swiss stone pine (Pinus cembra) is a slow-growing, but long-lived conifer. It grows naturally in the highest forest belt of the mountains in the continental Alps, as well as in higher regions of the Carpathian Mountains. In its natural environment, it has an important protective function in decreasing soil erosion and avalanches. The tree has large, edible seeds, which are tasty and rich in nutrients.

The Swiss stone pine grows very slowly; under natural conditions, it may take it 30 years to reach 1.30 m. As a result, the tree is a weak competitor compared with other trees. However, it is better adapted to the harsh upper subalpine climate conditions than any other European tree species, which makes it useful for afforestation in high elevations.

The timber is of good quality and highly valued for carvings, paneling and traditional furniture. Yet, its slow growth and irregular shape limit such use, hence only small quantities of wood are traded.

The Swiss stone pine germinates well on organic soils with an accumulated layer of litter and moss. It also has the ability to establish itself on mineral soils or even rocky surfaces and is able to resist very low winter temperatures.

in situ genetic conservation unit
ex situ genetic conservation unit
Map elements
About map elements

To learn more about the map elements, please download the “Pan-European strategy for genetic conservation of forest trees"

Acknowledgements

The following experts have contributed to the development of the EUFORGEN distribution maps:

Fazia Krouchi (Algeria), Hasmik Ghalachyan (Armenia), Thomas Geburek (Austria), Berthold Heinze (Austria), Rudi Litschauer (Austria), Rudolf Litschauer (Austria), Michael Mengl (Austria), Ferdinand Müller (Austria), Franz Starlinger (Austria), Valida Ali-zade (Azerbaijan), Vahid Djalal Hajiyev (Azerbaijan), Karen Cox (Belgium), Bart De Cuyper (Belgium), Olivier Desteucq (Belgium), Patrick Mertens (Belgium), Jos Van Slycken (Belgium), An Vanden Broeck (Belgium), Kristine Vander Mijnsbrugge (Belgium), Dalibor Ballian (Bosnia and Herzegovina), Alexander H. Alexandrov (Bulgaria), Alexander Delkov (Bulgaria), Ivanova Denitsa Pandeva (Bulgaria), Peter Zhelev Stoyanov (Bulgaria), Joso Gracan (Croatia), Marilena Idzojtic (Croatia), Mladen Ivankovic (Croatia), Željka Ivanović (Croatia), Davorin Kajba (Croatia), Hrvoje Marjanovic (Croatia), Sanja Peric (Croatia), Andreas Christou (Cyprus), Xenophon Hadjikyriacou (Cyprus), Václav Buriánek (Czech Republic), Jan Chládek (Czech Republic), Josef Frýdl (Czech Republic), Petr Novotný (Czech Republic), Martin Slovacek (Czech Republic), Zdenek Špišek (Czech Republic), Karel Vancura (Czech Republic), Ulrik Bräuner (Denmark), Bjerne Ditlevsen (Denmark), Jon Kehlet Hansen (Denmark), Jan Svejgaard Jensen (Denmark), Kalev Jðgiste (Estonia), Tiit Maaten (Estonia), Raul Pihu (Estonia), Ülo Tamm (Estonia), Arvo Tullus (Estonia), Aivo Vares (Estonia), Teijo Nikkanen (Finland), Sanna Paanukoski (Finland), Mari Rusanen (Finland), Pekka Vakkari (Finland), Leena Yrjänä (Finland), Daniel Cambon (France), Eric Collin (France), Alexis Ducousso (France), Bruno Fady (France), François Lefèvre (France), Brigitte Musch (France), Sylvie Oddou-Muratorio (France), Luc E. Pâques (France), Julien Saudubray (France), Marc Villar (France), Vlatko Andonovski (FYR Macedonia), Dragi Pop-Stojanov (FYR Macedonia), Merab Machavariani (Georgia), Irina Tvauri (Georgia), Alexander Urushadze (Georgia), Bernd Degen (Germany), Jochen Kleinschmit (Germany), Armin König (Germany), Armin König (Germany), Volker Schneck (Germany), Richard Stephan (Germany), H. H. Kausch-Blecken Von Schmeling (Germany), Georg von Wühlisch (Germany), Iris Wagner (Germany), Heino Wolf (Germany), Paraskevi Alizoti (Greece), Filippos Aravanopoulos (Greece), Andreas Drouzas (Greece), Despina Paitaridou (Greece), Aristotelis C. Papageorgiou (Greece), Kostas Thanos (Greece), Sándor Bordács (Hungary), Csaba Mátyás (Hungary), László Nagy (Hungary), Thröstur Eysteinsson (Iceland), Adalsteinn Sigurgeirsson (Iceland), Halldór Sverrisson (Iceland), John Fennessy (Ireland), Ellen O'Connor (Ireland), Fulvio Ducci (Italy), Silvia Fineschi (Italy), Bartolomeo Schirone (Italy), Marco Cosimo Simeone (Italy), Giovanni Giuseppe Vendramin (Italy), Lorenzo Vietto (Italy), Janis Birgelis (Latvia), Virgilijus Baliuckas (Lithuania), Kestutis Cesnavicius (Lithuania), Darius Danusevicius (Lithuania), Valmantas Kundrotas (Lithuania), Alfas Pliûra (Lithuania), Darius Raudonius (Lithuania), Robert du Fays (Luxembourg), Myriam Heuertz (Luxembourg), Claude Parini (Luxembourg), Fred Trossen (Luxembourg), Frank Wolter (Luxembourg), Joseph Buhagiar (Malta), Eman Calleja (Malta), Ion Palancean (Moldova), Dragos Postolache (Moldova), Gheorghe Postolache (Moldova), Hassan Sbay (Morocco), Tor Myking (Norway), Tore Skrøppa (Norway), Anna Gugala (Poland), Jan Kowalczyk (Poland), Czeslaw Koziol (Poland), Jan Matras (Poland), Zbigniew Sobierajski (Poland), Maria Helena Almeida (Portugal), Filipe Costa e Silva (Portugal), Luís Reis (Portugal), Maria Carolina Varela (Portugal), Ioan Blada (Romania), Alexandru-Lucian Curtu (Romania), Lucian Dinca (Romania), Georgeta Mihai (Romania), Mihai Olaru (Romania), Gheorghe Parnuta (Romania), Natalia Demidova (Russian Federation), Mikhail V. Pridnya (Russian Federation), Andrey Prokazin (Russian Federation), Srdjan Bojovic (Serbia) , Vasilije Isajev (Serbia), Saša Orlovic (Serbia), Rudolf Bruchánik (Slovakia), Roman Longauer (Slovakia), Ladislav Paule (Slovakia), Gregor Bozič (Slovenia), Robert Brus (Slovenia), Katarina Celič (Slovenia), Hojka Kraigher (Slovenia), Andrej Verlič (Slovenia), Marjana Westergren (Slovenia), Ricardo Alía (Spain), Josefa Fernández-López (Spain), Luis Gil Sanchez (Spain), Pablo Gonzalez Goicoechea (Spain), Santiago C. González-Martínez (Spain), Sonia Martin Albertos (Spain), Eduardo Notivol Paino (Spain), María Arantxa Prada (Spain), Alvaro Soto de Viana (Spain), Lennart Ackzell (Sweden), Jonas Bergquist (Sweden), Sanna Black-Samuelsson (Sweden), Jonas Cedergren (Sweden), Gösta Eriksson (Sweden), Markus Bolliger (Switzerland), Felix Gugerli (Switzerland), Rolf Holderegger (Switzerland), Peter Rotach (Switzerland), Marcus Ulber (Switzerland), Sven M.G. de Vries (The Netherlands), Khouja Mohamed Larbi (Tunisia), Murat Alan (Turkey), Gaye Kandemir (Turkey), Gursel Karagöz (Turkey), Zeki Kaya (Turkey), Hasan Özer (Turkey), Hacer Semerci (Turkey), Ferit Toplu (Turkey), Mykola M. Vedmid (Ukraine), Roman T. Volosyanchuk (Ukraine), Stuart A'Hara (United Kingdom), Joan Cottrell (United Kingdom), Colin Edwards (United Kingdom), Michael Frankis (United Kingdom), Jason Hubert (United Kingdom), Karen Russell (United Kingdom), C.J.A. Samuel (United Kingdom).

Technical guidelines for genetic conservation and use

Pinus cembra - Technical guidelines for genetic conservation and use for Swiss stone pine

Publication Year: 2004
Author: Ulber, M.; Gugerli, F.; Bozic, G.

The main strategy of genetic conservation of Swiss stone pine should be a dynamic in situ conservation. However, complementary dynamic or static ex situ conservation may be appropriate in some cases.

In situ conservation can be done within natural forest reserves, in gene conservation units specifically managed for the purpose, as well as in forests managed mainly for other purposes. Generally, abundant and large stands of interfertile autochthonous stone pine trees are best to assure genetic adaptability and adaptedness in the long term. However, small and isolated populations of P. cembra can be of special interest if particular adaptations can be assumed.

Normally, gene conservation can be matched with other goals of the stand management. As many of the P. cembra forests are expected to fulfil protection and/or aesthetic functions, a continuous tree cover is needed. A sufficiently dense, multilayered, uneven-aged forest with a clustered structure meets these demands best. Small-scale silvicultural practices such as the group selection method or the cluster selection method are recommended for both wood production and protection purposes. Where stone pine is naturally mixed with other tree species it is advisable to retain the mixture.

The crucial point in any case for a dynamic in situ gene conservation is the regeneration of the stand. Natural regeneration is considered to be the best way for gene conservation.

If there are suitable germination sites and seed trees within the nutcracker's dispersal range, regeneration of P. cembra occurs naturally. Sometimes a very dense cover of grasses or Alpine roses can be an obstacle for seedling growth, and the removal of patches of this vegetation can be useful. If necessary, animals affecting the young plants have to be excluded or individual protection measures must be taken. Forest gaps smaller in diameter than the height of the surrounding stand tend to accumulate snow during the winter and become snowfree only late in spring. Therefore, the dimensions of regeneration gaps should be 1–4 times the stand height depending on the site conditions.

For artificial regeneration in existing stands or for highelevation afforestations with P. cembra, reproductive material must be chosen carefully owing to extreme site conditions. Only well-adapted and sufficiently variable material originating from similar sites ensures a long-term success for both production and protection purposes. For plantations near the tree limit, the provenance of the material should lie within a 100-metre altitude range relative to the planting site. It is suggested to breed the plants in montane altitudes and to transplant them into a nursery located above 1500 m asl to ensure hardy acclimatization. Direct seeding has proven to be a satisfactory alternative to planting. As a consequence of the erratic seed production and the slow growth process, the planning of a plantation should start well in advance. Seed orchards at lower altitudes containing high-elevation provenances can facilitate a more regular supply of seeds.

Seed orchards can serve as a means of dynamic ex situ conservation of P. cembra if the number of progenies is sufficiently high (at least 50 trees proposed per origin population), especially in the case of endangered small or relic populations. However, it is preferable to conduct dynamic ex situ conservation in the vicinity of the original site and to use the local material. This is what the nutcracker tends to do when it "salvages" the species from accessible spots to rocky outcrops where the seedlings may survive.

Static ex situ conservation of reproductive material of P. cembra for gene conservation purposes is advisable only in case of emergency and the material should be recultivated as soon as possible.

The main strategy of genetic conservation of Swiss stone pine should be a dynamic in situ conservation. However, complementary dynamic or static ex situ conservation may be appropriate in some cases.

In situ conservation can be done within natural forest reserves, in gene conservation units specifically managed for the purpose, as well as in...

Download

Related publications