To learn more about the map elements, please download the "Pan-European strategy for genetic conservation of forest trees"
This distribution map has been developed by the European Commission Joint Research Centre (partly based on the EUFORGEN map) and released under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0)
Caudullo, Giovanni; Welk, Erik; San-Miguel-Ayanz, Jesús (2017). Chorological maps and data for the main European woody species. figshare. Collection. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.2918528
The following experts have contributed to the development of the EUFORGEN distribution maps:
Fazia Krouchi (Algeria), Hasmik Ghalachyan (Armenia), Thomas Geburek (Austria), Berthold Heinze (Austria), Rudi Litschauer (Austria), Rudolf Litschauer (Austria), Michael Mengl (Austria), Ferdinand Müller (Austria), Franz Starlinger (Austria), Valida Ali-zade (Azerbaijan), Vahid Djalal Hajiyev (Azerbaijan), Karen Cox (Belgium), Bart De Cuyper (Belgium), Olivier Desteucq (Belgium), Patrick Mertens (Belgium), Jos Van Slycken (Belgium), An Vanden Broeck (Belgium), Kristine Vander Mijnsbrugge (Belgium), Dalibor Ballian (Bosnia and Herzegovina), Alexander H. Alexandrov (Bulgaria), Alexander Delkov (Bulgaria), Ivanova Denitsa Pandeva (Bulgaria), Peter Zhelev Stoyanov (Bulgaria), Joso Gracan (Croatia), Marilena Idzojtic (Croatia), Mladen Ivankovic (Croatia), Željka Ivanović (Croatia), Davorin Kajba (Croatia), Hrvoje Marjanovic (Croatia), Sanja Peric (Croatia), Andreas Christou (Cyprus), Xenophon Hadjikyriacou (Cyprus), Václav Buriánek (Czech Republic), Jan Chládek (Czech Republic), Josef Frýdl (Czech Republic), Petr Novotný (Czech Republic), Martin Slovacek (Czech Republic), Zdenek Špišek (Czech Republic), Karel Vancura (Czech Republic), Ulrik Bräuner (Denmark), Bjerne Ditlevsen (Denmark), Jon Kehlet Hansen (Denmark), Jan Svejgaard Jensen (Denmark), Kalev Jðgiste (Estonia), Tiit Maaten (Estonia), Raul Pihu (Estonia), Ülo Tamm (Estonia), Arvo Tullus (Estonia), Aivo Vares (Estonia), Teijo Nikkanen (Finland), Sanna Paanukoski (Finland), Mari Rusanen (Finland), Pekka Vakkari (Finland), Leena Yrjänä (Finland), Daniel Cambon (France), Eric Collin (France), Alexis Ducousso (France), Bruno Fady (France), François Lefèvre (France), Brigitte Musch (France), Sylvie Oddou-Muratorio (France), Luc E. Pâques (France), Julien Saudubray (France), Marc Villar (France), Vlatko Andonovski (FYR Macedonia), Dragi Pop-Stojanov (FYR Macedonia), Merab Machavariani (Georgia), Irina Tvauri (Georgia), Alexander Urushadze (Georgia), Bernd Degen (Germany), Jochen Kleinschmit (Germany), Armin König (Germany), Armin König (Germany), Volker Schneck (Germany), Richard Stephan (Germany), H. H. Kausch-Blecken Von Schmeling (Germany), Georg von Wühlisch (Germany), Iris Wagner (Germany), Heino Wolf (Germany), Paraskevi Alizoti (Greece), Filippos Aravanopoulos (Greece), Andreas Drouzas (Greece), Despina Paitaridou (Greece), Aristotelis C. Papageorgiou (Greece), Kostas Thanos (Greece), Sándor Bordács (Hungary), Csaba Mátyás (Hungary), László Nagy (Hungary), Thröstur Eysteinsson (Iceland), Adalsteinn Sigurgeirsson (Iceland), Halldór Sverrisson (Iceland), John Fennessy (Ireland), Ellen O'Connor (Ireland), Fulvio Ducci (Italy), Silvia Fineschi (Italy), Bartolomeo Schirone (Italy), Marco Cosimo Simeone (Italy), Giovanni Giuseppe Vendramin (Italy), Lorenzo Vietto (Italy), Janis Birgelis (Latvia), Virgilijus Baliuckas (Lithuania), Kestutis Cesnavicius (Lithuania), Darius Danusevicius (Lithuania), Valmantas Kundrotas (Lithuania), Alfas Pliûra (Lithuania), Darius Raudonius (Lithuania), Robert du Fays (Luxembourg), Myriam Heuertz (Luxembourg), Claude Parini (Luxembourg), Fred Trossen (Luxembourg), Frank Wolter (Luxembourg), Joseph Buhagiar (Malta), Eman Calleja (Malta), Ion Palancean (Moldova), Dragos Postolache (Moldova), Gheorghe Postolache (Moldova), Hassan Sbay (Morocco), Tor Myking (Norway), Tore Skrøppa (Norway), Anna Gugala (Poland), Jan Kowalczyk (Poland), Czeslaw Koziol (Poland), Jan Matras (Poland), Zbigniew Sobierajski (Poland), Maria Helena Almeida (Portugal), Filipe Costa e Silva (Portugal), Luís Reis (Portugal), Maria Carolina Varela (Portugal), Ioan Blada (Romania), Alexandru-Lucian Curtu (Romania), Lucian Dinca (Romania), Georgeta Mihai (Romania), Mihai Olaru (Romania), Gheorghe Parnuta (Romania), Natalia Demidova (Russian Federation), Mikhail V. Pridnya (Russian Federation), Andrey Prokazin (Russian Federation), Srdjan Bojovic (Serbia) , Vasilije Isajev (Serbia), Saša Orlovic (Serbia), Rudolf Bruchánik (Slovakia), Roman Longauer (Slovakia), Ladislav Paule (Slovakia), Gregor Bozič (Slovenia), Robert Brus (Slovenia), Katarina Celič (Slovenia), Hojka Kraigher (Slovenia), Andrej Verlič (Slovenia), Marjana Westergren (Slovenia), Ricardo Alía (Spain), Josefa Fernández-López (Spain), Luis Gil Sanchez (Spain), Pablo Gonzalez Goicoechea (Spain), Santiago C. González-Martínez (Spain), Sonia Martin Albertos (Spain), Eduardo Notivol Paino (Spain), María Arantxa Prada (Spain), Alvaro Soto de Viana (Spain), Lennart Ackzell (Sweden), Jonas Bergquist (Sweden), Sanna Black-Samuelsson (Sweden), Jonas Cedergren (Sweden), Gösta Eriksson (Sweden), Markus Bolliger (Switzerland), Felix Gugerli (Switzerland), Rolf Holderegger (Switzerland), Peter Rotach (Switzerland), Marcus Ulber (Switzerland), Sven M.G. de Vries (The Netherlands), Khouja Mohamed Larbi (Tunisia), Murat Alan (Turkey), Gaye Kandemir (Turkey), Gursel Karagöz (Turkey), Zeki Kaya (Turkey), Hasan Özer (Turkey), Hacer Semerci (Turkey), Ferit Toplu (Turkey), Mykola M. Vedmid (Ukraine), Roman T. Volosyanchuk (Ukraine), Stuart A'Hara (United Kingdom), Joan Cottrell (United Kingdom), Colin Edwards (United Kingdom), Michael Frankis (United Kingdom), Jason Hubert (United Kingdom), Karen Russell (United Kingdom), C.J.A. Samuel (United Kingdom).
Status of Arbutus unedo conservation in Europe
The strawberry tree shows variable patterns of genetic diversity across its range. Tunisian populations display low diversity due to genetic drift, selfing, and bottlenecks linked to fragmentation and deforestation (Takrouni and Boussaid, 2010), whereas Portuguese populations retain high variability(Gomes et al., 2013). At the species level, most genetic variation occurs within rather than among populations (Takrouni and Boussaid, 2010). Overall, the species maintains high levels of variation and appears relatively insensitive to genetic erosion or isolation, as even genetically depleted populations have similar genetic diversity to healthier, more central populations (Santiso et al., 2016).
Genetic differentiation in the strawberry tree is low to moderate. Studies found low–moderate differentiation among Tunisian and Portuguese populations, attributed in part to the species’ capacity for long-distance seed dispersal (Takrouni and Boussaid, 2010). In Tunisia, differentiation levels varied regionally (Takrouni and Boussaid, 2010), while Ribeiro et al. (2017) found moderate differentiation among populations in Portugal.
Genetic clustering in the strawberry tree does not follow clear geographic or environmental patterns (Gomes et al., 2013). Tunisian populations were grouped into three clusters, suggesting differentiation occurs at a local spatial scale (Takrouni and Boussaid, 2010). In Portugal, two well-differentiated genetic clusters were identified (one in the centre of the country, one in the south), with both clusters containing populations of high genetic diversity (Ribeiro et al., 2017). Genetic diversity is significantly lower in north-western Iberia and Ireland than in populations from other areas. Populations in Ireland showed stronger genetic similarity to those in north-western Iberia than to those in nearby Atlantic France, suggesting a postglacial stepping-stone colonization along the Atlantic coast (Santiso et al., 2016).
Strawberry tree is a diploid species that reproduces sexually through seeds and can also spread vegetatively via root suckers (Takrouni and Boussaid, 2010). Gene flow occurs primarily through pollination by bees and other insects and seed dispersal by birds, mammals, and gravity (Takrouni and Boussaid, 2010; Gomes et al., 2013). Across the species’ range, gene flow is often restricted at small scales, with limited exchange even between trees within 500 m of each other; however, long-distance seed dispersal by frugivores, particularly birds, can occur, connecting populations over larger distances (Gomes et al., 2013). Patterns of isolation-by-distance are observed along the Atlantic coast, while Mediterranean populations maintain higher connectivity (Santiso et al., 2016).
The bibliographic review was conducted by James Chaplin of the EUFORGEN Secretariat in August 2025.
Human cultivation and intervention have significantly shaped the genetic diversity and distribution of the strawberry tree. The species has long been valued for its edible fruits, medicinal uses (antiseptic, diuretic, laxative, and vascular treatments), and traditional roles such as fuelwood (Takrouni and Boussaid, 2010). Widespread and long-term human use in the Mediterranean has blurred the species’ natural geographic genetic patterns, reducing the ability to clearly distinguish between natural and human-influenced variation (Gomes et al., 2013). Despite its economic and cultural importance, breeding programmes have rarely been attempted, and most material still comes from wild populations, leading to limited selection of high-quality cultivars (Takrouni and Boussaid, 2010). However, the species is currently undergoing intense domestication in the Iberian Peninsula, especially for fruit quality traits and the production of aguardente in Portugal, where clonal propagation of selected genotypes is increasingly used (Ribeiro et al., 2017). This domestication and commercialization, including the use of clones and seed transfer from unknown origins, has the potential to alter the genetic structure of natural populations (Ribeiro et al., 2017). The species remains categorized as a neglected or underutilized crop, with growing research interest in its genetics for breeding, conservation, and industrial applications (Gomes et al., 2013).
During the Last Glacial Maximum, the strawberry tree likely survived in refugial areas in Portugal and possibly northern Africa, with most Iberian populations undergoing a postglacial expansion (Ribeiro et al., 2017). There is a clear division between Atlantic and Mediterranean lineages, suggesting the persistence of independent glacial refugia in these regions rather than more recent biogeographic barriers (Santiso et al., 2016). This historic separation explains the distinct genetic structure observed today, including the presence of the strawberry tree in Ireland but not Britain (Santiso et al., 2016). Colonization of the Atlantic coast appears to have followed a stepping-stone model, resulting in a gradual northward decline in genetic diversity, especially in Ireland (Santiso et al., 2016).
The bibliographic review was conducted by James Chaplin of the EUFORGEN Secretariat in August 2025.
Strawberry tree faces multiple threats to its genetic resources. In North Africa, particularly Tunisia, populations are being severely reduced by deforestation, over-collecting, and their small, scattered, and declining nature (Takrouni and Boussaid, 2010). The species is increasingly threatened by climate change, habitat fragmentation, and wildfires, reducing effective population sizes and eroding genetic diversity through repeated disturbance (Ribeiro et al., 2017). Additionally, domestication practices and reliance on vegetative propagation may exacerbate risks of genetic erosion and inbreeding (Ribeiro et al., 2017). Fragmented, small populations are particularly vulnerable to genetic drift, reduced gene flow, and elevated differentiation (Takrouni and Boussaid, 2010; Gomes et al., 2013).
Effective management requires both in situ and ex situ measures, with in situ protection tailored to local conditions, and ex situ collections emphasizing within-population sampling to capture local diversity (Takrouni and Boussaid, 2010). Conservation strategies should prioritize populations based on allelic richness, haplotypic uniqueness, and genetic structure (Ribeiro et al., 2017). This includes identifying key populations for conservation, such as those in Portugal as identified by Ribeiro et al., (2017). Long-term strategies should also consider the impacts of frequent wildfires, ongoing domestication, and breeding programmes, ensuring that genetic improvement efforts mirror the natural diversity and haplotypic richness of the species (Ribeiro et al., 2017).
The bibliographic review was conducted by James Chaplin of the EUFORGEN Secretariat in August 2025.
Genetic Characterisation of Arbutus unedo and its GCUs
Availability of FRM
Further reading
Lopes, L., Sá, O., Pereira, J.A., and Baptista, P. 2012. Genetic diversity of Portuguese Arbutus unedo L. populations using leaf traits and molecular markers: An approach for conservation purposes. Scientia Horticulturae, 142: 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2012.04.031
Santiso, X., López, L., Gilbert, K.J., Barreiro, R., Whitlock, M.C., and Retuerto, R. 2015. Patterns of genetic variation within and among populations in Arbutus unedo and its relation with selection and evolvability. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 17(3): 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppees.2015.02.006
Takrouni, M.M., Ali, I.B.E.H., Messaoued, C., and Boussaid, M. 2012. Genetic variability of Tunisian wild strawberry tree (Arbutus unedo L.) populations interfered from isozyme markers. Scientia Horticulturae, 146: 92–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2012.08.005
References
Gomes, F., Costa, R., Ribeiro, M.M., Figueiredo, E., and Canhoto, J.M. 2013. Analysis of genetic relationship among Arbutus unedo L. genotypes using RAPD and SSR markers. Journal of Forestry Research, 24(2): 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-012-0302-0
Ribeiro, M.M., Piotti, A., Ricardo, A., Gaspar, D., Costa, R., Parducci, L., and Vendramin, G.G. 2017. Genetic diversity and divergence at the Arbutus unedo L.(Ericaceae) westernmost distribution limit. PLoS One, 12(4): e0175239. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175239
Santiso, X., Lopez, L., Retuerto, R., and Barreiro, R. 2016. Population structure of a widespread species under balancing selection: The case of Arbutus unedo L. Frontiers in Plant Science, 6: 1264. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.01264
Takrouni, M.M. and Boussaid, M., 2010. Genetic diversity and population's structure in Tunisian strawberry tree (Arbutus unedo L.). Scientia Horticulturae, 126(3): 330–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2010.07.031
If you notice any error in the contents of this species page, please contact euforgen@efi.int