Lonicera periclymenum

Credit:

European honeysuckle (Lonicera periclymenum) is a widespread deciduous climbing vine or shrub native to Europe. It is particularly abundant in the British Isles, Western and Central Europe, and parts of southern Scandinavia. It thrives in woodlands, hedgerows, and scrublands, often climbing on trees or shrubs for support. The species is adaptable to various light and soil conditions but prefers moist, well-drained soils, and semi-shaded habitats, making it a characteristic component of mixed deciduous forests and forest edges. 

European honeysuckle plays a vital role in supporting pollinators and wildlife. Its fragrant tubular flowers, which bloom from late spring to summer, are rich in nectar and attract moths, bees, and long-tongued insects, particularly night-flying hawkmoths. The berries, ripening in late summer to autumn, provide an important food source for birds, aiding seed dispersal. European honeysuckle is valued for its ornamental qualities and is frequently cultivated in gardens for its strongly scented flowers and climbing habit. It is also used in habitat restoration and biodiversity planting schemes due to its benefits for pollinators and native fauna. 

in situ genetic conservation unit+
ex situ genetic conservation unit+
Map elements


Download the distribution map
About map elements

To learn more about the map elements, please download the "Pan-European strategy for genetic conservation of forest trees"

Acknowledgements

This distribution map has been developed by the European Commission Joint Research Centre (partly based on the EUFORGEN map) and released under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0)


Caudullo, Giovanni; Welk, Erik; San-Miguel-Ayanz, Jesús (2017). Chorological maps and data for the main European woody species. figshare. Collection. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.2918528

 

The following experts have contributed to the development of the EUFORGEN distribution maps:

Fazia Krouchi (Algeria), Hasmik Ghalachyan (Armenia), Thomas Geburek (Austria), Berthold Heinze (Austria), Rudi Litschauer (Austria), Rudolf Litschauer (Austria), Michael Mengl (Austria), Ferdinand Müller (Austria), Franz Starlinger (Austria), Valida Ali-zade (Azerbaijan), Vahid Djalal Hajiyev (Azerbaijan), Karen Cox (Belgium), Bart De Cuyper (Belgium), Olivier Desteucq (Belgium), Patrick Mertens (Belgium), Jos Van Slycken (Belgium), An Vanden Broeck (Belgium), Kristine Vander Mijnsbrugge (Belgium), Dalibor Ballian (Bosnia and Herzegovina), Alexander H. Alexandrov (Bulgaria), Alexander Delkov (Bulgaria), Ivanova Denitsa Pandeva (Bulgaria), Peter Zhelev Stoyanov (Bulgaria), Joso Gracan (Croatia), Marilena Idzojtic (Croatia), Mladen Ivankovic (Croatia), Željka Ivanović (Croatia), Davorin Kajba (Croatia), Hrvoje Marjanovic (Croatia), Sanja Peric (Croatia), Andreas Christou (Cyprus), Xenophon Hadjikyriacou (Cyprus), Václav Buriánek (Czech Republic), Jan Chládek (Czech Republic), Josef Frýdl (Czech Republic), Petr Novotný (Czech Republic), Martin Slovacek (Czech Republic), Zdenek Špišek (Czech Republic), Karel Vancura (Czech Republic), Ulrik Bräuner (Denmark), Bjerne Ditlevsen (Denmark), Jon Kehlet Hansen (Denmark), Jan Svejgaard Jensen (Denmark), Kalev Jðgiste (Estonia), Tiit Maaten (Estonia), Raul Pihu (Estonia), Ülo Tamm (Estonia), Arvo Tullus (Estonia), Aivo Vares (Estonia), Teijo Nikkanen (Finland), Sanna Paanukoski (Finland), Mari Rusanen (Finland), Pekka Vakkari (Finland), Leena Yrjänä (Finland), Daniel Cambon (France), Eric Collin (France), Alexis Ducousso (France), Bruno Fady (France), François Lefèvre (France), Brigitte Musch (France), Sylvie Oddou-Muratorio (France), Luc E. Pâques (France), Julien Saudubray (France), Marc Villar (France), Vlatko Andonovski (FYR Macedonia), Dragi Pop-Stojanov (FYR Macedonia), Merab Machavariani (Georgia), Irina Tvauri (Georgia), Alexander Urushadze (Georgia), Bernd Degen (Germany), Jochen Kleinschmit (Germany), Armin König (Germany), Armin König (Germany), Volker Schneck (Germany), Richard Stephan (Germany), H. H. Kausch-Blecken Von Schmeling (Germany), Georg von Wühlisch (Germany), Iris Wagner (Germany), Heino Wolf (Germany), Paraskevi Alizoti (Greece), Filippos Aravanopoulos (Greece), Andreas Drouzas (Greece), Despina Paitaridou (Greece), Aristotelis C. Papageorgiou (Greece), Kostas Thanos (Greece), Sándor Bordács (Hungary), Csaba Mátyás (Hungary), László Nagy (Hungary), Thröstur Eysteinsson (Iceland), Adalsteinn Sigurgeirsson (Iceland), Halldór Sverrisson (Iceland), John Fennessy (Ireland), Ellen O'Connor (Ireland), Fulvio Ducci (Italy), Silvia Fineschi (Italy), Bartolomeo Schirone (Italy), Marco Cosimo Simeone (Italy), Giovanni Giuseppe Vendramin (Italy), Lorenzo Vietto (Italy), Janis Birgelis (Latvia), Virgilijus Baliuckas (Lithuania), Kestutis Cesnavicius (Lithuania), Darius Danusevicius (Lithuania), Valmantas Kundrotas (Lithuania), Alfas Pliûra (Lithuania), Darius Raudonius (Lithuania), Robert du Fays (Luxembourg), Myriam Heuertz (Luxembourg), Claude Parini (Luxembourg), Fred Trossen (Luxembourg), Frank Wolter (Luxembourg), Joseph Buhagiar (Malta), Eman Calleja (Malta), Ion Palancean (Moldova), Dragos Postolache (Moldova), Gheorghe Postolache (Moldova), Hassan Sbay (Morocco), Tor Myking (Norway), Tore Skrøppa (Norway), Anna Gugala (Poland), Jan Kowalczyk (Poland), Czeslaw Koziol (Poland), Jan Matras (Poland), Zbigniew Sobierajski (Poland), Maria Helena Almeida (Portugal), Filipe Costa e Silva (Portugal), Luís Reis (Portugal), Maria Carolina Varela (Portugal), Ioan Blada (Romania), Alexandru-Lucian Curtu (Romania), Lucian Dinca (Romania), Georgeta Mihai (Romania), Mihai Olaru (Romania), Gheorghe Parnuta (Romania), Natalia Demidova (Russian Federation), Mikhail V. Pridnya (Russian Federation), Andrey Prokazin (Russian Federation), Srdjan Bojovic (Serbia) , Vasilije Isajev (Serbia), Saša Orlovic (Serbia), Rudolf Bruchánik (Slovakia), Roman Longauer (Slovakia), Ladislav Paule (Slovakia), Gregor Bozič (Slovenia), Robert Brus (Slovenia), Katarina Celič (Slovenia), Hojka Kraigher (Slovenia), Andrej Verlič (Slovenia), Marjana Westergren (Slovenia), Ricardo Alía (Spain), Josefa Fernández-López (Spain), Luis Gil Sanchez (Spain), Pablo Gonzalez Goicoechea (Spain), Santiago C. González-Martínez (Spain), Sonia Martin Albertos (Spain), Eduardo Notivol Paino (Spain), María Arantxa Prada (Spain), Alvaro Soto de Viana (Spain), Lennart Ackzell (Sweden), Jonas Bergquist (Sweden), Sanna Black-Samuelsson (Sweden), Jonas Cedergren (Sweden), Gösta Eriksson (Sweden), Markus Bolliger (Switzerland), Felix Gugerli (Switzerland), Rolf Holderegger (Switzerland), Peter Rotach (Switzerland), Marcus Ulber (Switzerland), Sven M.G. de Vries (The Netherlands), Khouja Mohamed Larbi (Tunisia), Murat Alan (Turkey), Gaye Kandemir (Turkey), Gursel Karagöz (Turkey), Zeki Kaya (Turkey), Hasan Özer (Turkey), Hacer Semerci (Turkey), Ferit Toplu (Turkey), Mykola M. Vedmid (Ukraine), Roman T. Volosyanchuk (Ukraine), Stuart A'Hara (United Kingdom), Joan Cottrell (United Kingdom), Colin Edwards (United Kingdom), Michael Frankis (United Kingdom), Jason Hubert (United Kingdom), Karen Russell (United Kingdom), C.J.A. Samuel (United Kingdom).
 

Genetic diversity and variation 

European honeysuckle has high genetic diversity within and between populations in Europe, with a high adaptability to diverse habitats (Smolik et al., 2006). Studies in the Netherlands and Poland revealed considerable genetic and phenotypic variation, even between cultivated and wild populations, indicating significant intraspecific diversity and regional differentiation (Grashof-Bokdam, Jansen, and Smulders, 1998; Smolik et al., 2006). Polish genotypes showed clear differences in morphology and phenology, further supporting the existence of genetically distinct local forms (Smolik et al., 2006). 

Studies across the honeysuckle (Lonicera) genus found a correlation between genetic and geographical distances, suggesting gradual genetic differentiation across regions (Xin, Huailiang, and Haiou, 2021). The genus demonstrates high genetic diversity, linked to strong adaptive capacity and resilience to changing environmental conditions (Xin, Huailiang, and Haiou, 2021). 

Genetic distribution and clustering 

Studies on European honeysuckle reveal a localized genetic structure influenced by limited gene flow and short-distance dispersal mechanisms. Genetic similarities between individuals decrease significantly with geographical distance up to 300 metres, suggesting that most gene flow occurs within populations, while long-distance dispersal is rare (Grashof-Bokdam, Jansen, and Smulders, 1998). This restricted movement of pollen and seeds contributes to the genetic differentiation of populations across the species’ range. 

Population structure analyses indicate moderate genetic differentiation and the formation of distinct genetic clusters in different regions, consistent with the species’ habitat fragmentation and limited dispersal ability (Grashof-Bokdam, Jansen, and Smulders, 1998). In Poland, cluster analysis divided populations into three main groups, reflecting both geographic separation and cultivated origins, highlighting regional divergence within the species (Smolik et al., 2006). 

Gene flow 

European honeysuckle primarily reproduces sexually, although vegetative reproduction also contributes to local diversity (Grashof-Bokdam, Jansen, and Smulders, 1998). Gene flow is restricted to short distances, typically within 300 metres (Grashof-Bokdam, Jansen, and Smulders, 1998). Seeds are dispersed by birds, while pollen is transferred by insects such as moths and bees, limiting long-distance dispersal and reinforcing local genetic clustering. 

As a result, offspring tend to establish close to the parent plant, leading to a highly localized genetic structure (Grashof-Bokdam, Jansen, and Smulders, 1998). Restricted gene flow promotes genetic distinctiveness within populations, maintaining overall diversity but also increasing the potential for isolation between fragmented populations. 

 

The bibliographic review was conducted by James Chaplin of the EUFORGEN Secretariat in August 2025.

Interspecific taxa dynamics 

Within the honeysuckle genus, there are two subgenera (Chamaecerasus and Lonicera) and three main sections (IsoxylosteumIsika, and Coeloxylosteum), showing significant morphological differentiation across 19 species (Xin, Huailiang, and Haiou, 2021). For European honeysuckle, such taxonomic separation contributes to its distinct genetic identity within the Lonicera complex while maintaining shared ancestral variation that supports adaptability and genetic resilience across related taxa (Xin, Huailiang, and Haiou, 2021). 

 

The bibliographic review was conducted by James Chaplin of the EUFORGEN Secretariat in August 2025.

Threats 

Research on the genetic diversity of European honeysuckle in Europe is limited, making it difficult to fully assess existing threats. However, habitat fragmentation, local population isolation, and reduced gene flow between distant populations contribute to genetic differentiation and potential loss of diversity (Grashof-Bokdam, Jansen, and Smulders, 1998). Such fragmentation may restrict pollinator movement and seed dispersal, limiting natural regeneration and adaptation potential under changing environmental conditions. 

Management 

Given the limited research, further genetic studies are essential to identify priority populations and understand their adaptive variation. Conservation strategies should focus on maintaining habitat connectivity, promoting natural regeneration, and preserving diverse populations across different ecological regions to sustain the species’ genetic resilience. Expanding molecular studies and monitoring population dynamics would help guide effective long-term management of European honeysuckle genetic resources in Europe. 

 

The bibliographic review was conducted by James Chaplin of the EUFORGEN Secretariat in August 2025.

Further reading

Smith, S.A. and Donoghue, M.J. 2010. Combining historical biogeography with niche modeling in the Caprifolium clade of Lonicera (CaprifoliaceaeDipsacales). Systematic Biology, 59(3): 322–341. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syq011 

References

Grashof‐Bokdam, C.J., Jansen, J., and Smulders, M.J.M. 1998. Dispersal patterns of Lonicera periclymenum determined by genetic analysis. Molecular Ecology, 7(2): 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00327.x 

Smolik, M., Zieliński, J., Rzepka-Plevneš, D., and Adamska, K. 2006. Polymorphism of microsatellite sequences in morphologically and phenologically different genotypes of Lonicera periclymenumJournal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, 4(2): 226–233. 

Xin, M.A., Huailiang, T.I.A.N., and Haiou, X.I.A. 2021. Genetic diversity of Lonicera L. (Caprifoliaceae) estimated by molecular markers and morphological characters. Genetika, 53(2): 651–662. https://doi.org/10.2298/GENSR2102651M 

If you notice any error in the contents of this species page, please contact euforgen@efi.int